Special Treatment for Air America ; Everyone Deserves First Amendment Protection
The Washington Times › October 26, 2006
Linked as:
The Washington Times › October 26, 2006
Linked as:Summary
When is a campaign donation not a campaign donation? Apparently if you spend the money to run a radio program instead of paying for campaign ads that run on that same program. Just look at Air America. With $41 million in losses since 2004, and $9.8 million owed just to Robert Glaser, RealNetworks chairman, Democrats who bankrolled this "company" weren't so much investors as campaign contributors. The losses are seen as simple business ineptitude,but Air America effectively, and perhaps intentionally, cleverly avoided the campaign finance limits which Democrats had worked so hard to pass.
With McCain-Feingold's "hard money" donation limits of $2,000 per candidate and "soft money" limits to party campaign committees of $57,500, there is no way that Mr. Glaser or other wealthy Democratic donors could have legally given such large sums directly to Democrats. But Air America provided a vehicle for their multimillion- dollar political campaigns.See the full content of this document
Extract
Special Treatment for Air America ; Everyone Deserves First Amendment Protection
Take Al Franken's show last Friday, the very day the network was declaring bankruptcy. The program devoted two-and-a-half hours to "Meet the Democrats," where five U.S. House and Senate candidates explained why they were the people for the job. ...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
research and markets wholesale managed data services revenue forecast in united arab emirates to 2015. | Norway Opera House Case Going to Trial | Let's Look at Furniture | Sentencia de Cours d appel January 15 2002 caso Cour d appel de Paris du 15 janvier 2002 2001/35497 | Sentencia de Cours d'appel, May 09, 2006 (caso Cour d'appel de Paris, 9 mai 2006, 05/06322) | Sentenza nº 900 de Tribunali Amministrativi Regionali Campania T.A.R - Campania Salerno March ... | sentenza nº 727 de tribunali amministrativi regionali, puglia, t.a.r. - puglia - lec...