Splitting Hairs and Risking Lives On a School Bus
The Washington Times › February 25, 2005
Linked as:
The Washington Times › February 25, 2005
Linked as:Summary
What is the difference between "should not" and "cannot"? If a father tells his teenage daughter that she "should not" smoke cigarettes and she later is caught smoking, can the daughter excuse her behavior by arguing that her father never said that she "cannot" smoke?
The implication here is that the daughter is given a choice to take her father's warning as advice, not as a directive.See the full content of this document
Extract
Splitting Hairs and Risking Lives On a School Bus
Some folks might call this splitting hairs, but anyone who has raised a teenager knows that you can't rely on vague words when you are laying down the law.
"Cannot" is clear because it means "do not" - or else there will be consequences. Sti...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
appeal of mid-penn consumer discount company, 891 f.2d 282 (3rd cir. 1989) | fenton v sullivan 863 f.2d 45 2nd cir 1988 | in the matter of city of springfield illinois petitioner. 818 f.2d 565 7th cir 1987 | U.S v Tyson William Dock 751 F.2d 388 6th Cir 1984 | Sentencia nº 1752 de Consiglio di Stato April 21 2010 | sentencia nº 4707 de consiglio di stato september 23 2009 | sentencia nº 5819 de consiglio di stato december 20 2010 | Sentencia nº 233214 de Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago Sala Sexta September 14 2011