Partial-Birth Ban Debated in Court ; Plaintiffs Insist Law Is Too Broad
The Washington Times › March 30, 2004
Linked as:
The Washington Times › March 30, 2004
Linked as:Summary
The federal ban on partial-birth abortions is too broad and unconstitutionally threatens women's access to abortion, an attorney for plaintiffs argued at the beginning of one of three federal court challenges of the new law yesterday.
Attorneys for the government, meanwhile, argued that Congress was right to ban the "inhumane procedure."See the full content of this document
Extract
Partial-Birth Ban Debated in Court ; Plaintiffs Insist Law Is Too Broad
Even before President Bush signed the bill into law in November, it was challenged by pro-choice groups in federal district courts in New York, Nebraska and California. The trials began yes...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Shansby named Sharper Image director. | IRIS International Reconvenes Annual Meeting of Stockholders; All Six Board Members Elected to New One Year Terms. | temporary staffing services. | Imperial Acquires Nak Property Near Joss alun. | Decisión nº PJ0022011000327 de Juzgado Segundo de Primera Instancia en función de Control, Audiencias y Medidas con competencia de delitos de viole... | Decisión de Tribunal Tercero de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Juicio de Tachira (Extensión San Cristóbal), de April 13, 2010 | Decisión nº S-N de Juzgado Cuarto Ejecutor de Medidas de los Municipios Maracaibo Jesús Enriqu... | Decisión nº 1333 de Juzgado de los Municipios Junin y Rafael Urdaneta de Tachira de April ...