Judicial Nominations Are Bipartisan No More ; Republicans Should Match Democrats in Fighting for Their Principles
The Washington Times › April 23, 2010
Linked as:
The Washington Times › April 23, 2010
Linked as:Summary
A few days ago, the doyen of the Supreme Court, liberal Justice John Paul Stevens, announced his impending retirement. Most likely, President Obama will nominate, as he did in the case of Sonia Sotomayor, a judge who hews to an activist judicial philosophy.
This is one that gives decisive weight, where statutory clarity may be lacking, to "what is in the judge's heart" - as then-Sen. Obama put it in 2005 when he was one of just 22 senators to oppose President George W. Bush's nomination of John G. Roberts Jr. as chief justice.See the full content of this document
Extract
Judicial Nominations Are Bipartisan No More ; Republicans Should Match Democrats in Fighting for Their Principles
Oliver Wendell Holmes once said he often had given judgment in favor of claimants whose cause he deplored, as well as against those whose cause he favored. That's what judges upholding the law need to be able to do. Yet conservat...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Concord EFS Inc Announces Conference Call. | Parsons Selected by Air Combat Command to Provide Services Worldwide. | ezSubscribe Expands DSET's CLEC Product Line; New Software Suite Streamlines Sales Process for CLECs. | gasonics international ceo asuri raghavan talks to the wall street transcript. | Sentencia nº 160 de Consiglio di Stato May 25 2010 | Arrêté du 16 novembre 2001 relatif à l extension de compétences pour exercer les inspections des établissements pharmaceutiques vétérinaires | Sentencia nº 3052 de Consiglio di Stato, June 06, 2008 | Sentencia nº 2767 de Consiglio di Stato, June 05, 2009