D.C. School Lunch Firm Challenged ; Vendor Nets Hefty Pacts Despite Nutritional, Food-Safety Issues
The Washington Times › January 26, 2010
Linked as:
The Washington Times › January 26, 2010
Linked as:Summary
A company that serves meals to 2 1/2 million schoolchildren daily in more than 500 districts nationwide, with multimillion-dollar contracts in both Washington, D.C., and Chicago, has a history of marginal quality and food-safety scares amid concerns over the nutritional content of its school menus, according to school and company records.
Chartwells-Thompson School Dining Services, a subsidiary of the Charlotte, N.C.-based Compass Group, owner of Burger King, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut, is one of North America's largest school cafeteria operators - its contracts with the Chicago Public Schools from 2001 to 2009 totaling more than $289 million and a D.C. operation that could net the firm as much as $140 million from 2008 to 2013.See the full content of this document
Extract
D.C. School Lunch Firm Challenged ; Vendor Nets Hefty Pacts Despite Nutritional, Food-Safety Issues
Besides sharing the same food service provider, the D.C. and Chicago districts both suffer from high rates of poverty and child obesity in what are known as "food deserts," areas with poor access to healthy, affordable food. The District has the highest rate of adolescent obesity in the country, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Chicago ranks fourth-highest.
Even as Congress weighs recommendations from the not-for-profit, nongove...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Sailors Say Blame Was Misplaced in Hazing Case | Knees knock over Brady Focus is on QB s return. | Marie Betts-Johnson. | Honor Roll / Recognizing the Accomplishments of Western New Yorkers | decreto 1346 sin titulo | Sentencia nº 5378 de Consiglio di Stato November 24 2010 | sentencia nº 139 de consiglio di stato, january 19, 2011 | Sentencia nº 2409 de Consiglio di Stato May 27 2010